In plain language

What Complipath is

Complipath is EU AI Act compliance software for companies with 20–100 employees that use or build AI. A rule engine classifies each AI system and cites the article; AI only drafts from your own documents, and a person confirms.

Complipath helps you do what the EU AI Act asks of you. The name for that kind of product is EU AI Act compliance software. It builds an inventory of the AI systems a company runs and classifies each one under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.

Written 2026-08-17 by Yobel Tzegai · last changed 2026-10-12. Every figure below is read from the pricing source at build time, not written here.

The easiest way for a European company to know exactly what the AI Act requires, and prove it. Every compliance decision has a source.

Check your AI systems, free

Who it is for

Companies with 20–100 employees, in any industry, that use or build AI.

From a conversation

One software company we spoke to spends about SEK 25,000 a month on outside legal help for this.

Complipath

Starter €499/month, for up to 20 AI systems. Prices exclude VAT.

What it does not do

Complipath never decides your risk level for you: it shows what the law says, where it says it and what follows, and the decision stays with you.

What it does

  • An inventory of every AI system, one row per system
  • Deterministic risk classification — a short set of questions, more if your answers open follow-ups; no language model in the decision path, the same answers always produce the same classification
  • The article behind every classification, quoted
  • The version of the Regulation each one was derived from, recorded and hashed
  • A shareable read-only link for a customer’s security review

Complipath decides with rules, not a language model. Every classification is made by a rule engine and cites the article, the engine version and the law version. AI only drafts text from your own documents. Every sentence links to its source, and a person confirms it.

Complipath provides legal information, not legal advice; it certifies nothing, runs no formal conformity assessment, and hands the questions that need a lawyer to a lawyer. The whole boundary: what the check can and cannot decide.

How it works, step by step

  1. 1 · Discover

    Live. Reads your website and suggests the AI systems it shows; paste a list, read a package.json, or let colleagues report a tool through a link.

  2. 2 · Classify

    Live. A rule engine decides the level and names the article it rests on, including the Article 5 practices.

  3. 3 · Understand

    Live. Every factor cites its provision, and the plan gives each system its next steps by role.

  4. 4 · Assign

    Live. Each obligation has an owner, a status and a date it applies from.

  5. 5 · Fix

    Live. The Annex IV documentation is drafted from your register, and says what it could not answer.

  6. 6 · Evidence

    Live. A file is linked to the requirements it proves, with the passage and its page.

  7. 7 · Monitor

    Live. When an amending act touches a provision your records cite, you get an email per affected system.

  8. 8 · Prove

    Live. Export the register with the law texts it was assessed against. Share a read-only link and read the audit log.

    Live. Answer customer questionnaires from your own record; hand over the audit pack.

What is live today, and what is not

Every capability buyers ask about, with its status in the product. 29 live, 4 live with limits, 0 in progress, 6 not supported. Status on 14 October 2026. Rules decide. AI only drafts. A person confirms.

  • AI inventoryLiveEvery AI system you build or use, with its owner and risk class.
  • Risk classificationLiveAnswers go through rules in code, never a language model, so the same answers always give the same result.
  • Article mappingLiveEach reason behind a verdict names the provision it rests on, so a reader can check it herself.
  • Obligations per systemWith limitsConfirming a classification creates the obligations that follow from it, each with a status, a place for evidence and an owner you fill in, and high-risk rows need the system's role recorded. A later, stricter classification adds no new duties unless you change the system's type or role.
  • DeadlinesLiveEach obligation carries the date it applies from, derived from where the provision sits rather than written onto the row.
  • Annex IV documentationLiveA workspace for the technical documentation, section by section, saying which Annex IV points each one answers.
  • Documentation draftingLiveDrafts a documentation section from the facts in your register, and says which limbs it could not answer.
  • Regulatory change monitoringLiveChecks the provisions your confirmed records cite against amending acts, and emails everyone in the workspace once per act, naming each system it touches.
  • Named ownersLiveA person behind every system and every duty.
  • Export (PDF, JSON, spreadsheet)LiveThe whole register as a spreadsheet, as JSON or as a PDF, with the exact law texts it was assessed against.
  • Evidence managementLiveUpload a file once. We read it and use it everywhere it helps: proof for requirements, text for the documentation, and a flag when it disagrees with an earlier answer.
  • DashboardLiveWhere every system stands, and what needs you this week.
  • AI literacy (Article 4)LiveRecords the measures you take to support AI literacy under Article 4 as amended: who was briefed on what, and when. It applies whatever your risk level.
  • Two-factor sign-inLiveA code from your phone after the email link. The owner can require it for everyone.
  • Audit logLiveShows who did what in the workspace, and when, as a list you can read and export.
  • Audit packLiveOne file with every classification, citation and confirmation — the one you hand to someone outside your company.
  • Customer questionnaires (audit room)LiveAnswers a customer's security or AI questionnaire from your own register and files, each answer with its source, and a person confirms it.
  • Audit reportLiveTurns a finished audit into one report with every answer, its source and who confirmed it, as PDF.
  • Answers in the customer's own formatLiveWrites your confirmed answers back into the customer's own Excel or Word file, keeping their layout.
  • Annex I checkWith limitsAsks whether a system is a safety part of a regulated product, like a machine or a medical device, and records your answers with the line of Annex I they rest on. When all three answers are yes, its high-risk requirements take 2 August 2028; it does not change the class or create Annex I requirements.
  • DPIA and FRIA: whether they applyLiveSays whether a data protection or fundamental rights impact assessment is required, likely or not for each system, quoting the article it rests on.
  • Step-by-step planWith limitsYour next steps from a fixed list of 38, ordered for your own systems, each broken into small steps with a time, the proof it needs and an owner where one is recorded. The steps for Articles 53, 54 and 55 appear once a system is marked as a general-purpose AI model you place on the market.
  • Review: what still needs youLiveShows what on a system still needs a person, each with its source, and quotes both sides where your own texts disagree.
  • View full documentLiveOpens a system's Annex IV documentation as one document, and downloads it as PDF or Word.
  • AI literacy briefingsLiveSends each person a briefing built from the law and your register, and records when they read it.
  • Usage policy watchLiveReads the public usage policies of Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, Mistral AI and OpenAI once a day and tells the owner when the text has changed; the vendor card says when a policy could not be read or is not watched.
  • Turn off all AI processingLiveOne switch in Settings stops every call to our AI providers, Anthropic and Perplexity, for the whole workspace.
  • Vendor managementLiveGroups your systems by vendor and shows which papers you hold from each, which are missing and which have expired.
  • Full risk-management lifecycleNot supportedArticle 9 is listed as a duty with its date, and the risk register records each risk with a level a person gives it, the reason, an owner, an action and a status. Testing and the cycle through the lifecycle are not in the app's list.
  • Conformity assessment (Article 43)Not supportedWe found no support for this in what we have built. The same search found the number in one file — a comment using it as an example of the Official Journal's citation form — and the words in six, every one of them quoting Article 6(1), point (b)'s third-party condition, an Article 5 sentence or a section name. No template, no column, no limb.
  • Post-market monitoring (Article 72)Not supportedWe found no support for this in what we have built. MVP searched 245 shipped source files, 44 migrations, 14 obligation templates, 15 export columns and 12 Annex IV limbs, on the article number and on the provision's own words: nothing on any of the five.
  • Serious incident reporting (Article 73)LiveSerious incidents, in the app's own words: it logs what went wrong with an AI system and shows the date a serious incident must be reported by and who is told, from Articles 73, 26(5) and 75(1a) as written; a person decides, and the owner is reminded. A Growth feature, included in Starter until Growth launches, live since 9 October 2026.
  • Fundamental rights impact assessment (Article 27)LiveTwo features. 'DPIA and FRIA: whether they apply' says for each confirmed system whether a fundamental rights impact assessment is required, likely or not, quoting Article 27(1). 'DPIA and FRIA documents', in the app's words, drafts the FRIA (Article 27(1)) from your register by rules, built on the DPIA, a source on every sentence, for a named person to confirm with a date: a Growth feature, included in Starter until Growth launches, live since 9 October 2026.
  • Declaration of conformity (Article 47)Not supportedThe Annex IV documentation asks for a copy of the declaration and you upload it; the plan says to issue it when the system is ready. The declaration itself is not drafted.
  • EU database registration (Article 49)Not supportedListed as a duty with its date. The registration itself is yours.
  • ISO/IEC 42001 mappingNot supportedThe assistant answers questions about ISO/IEC 42001 next to the AI Act. There is no mapping of its controls to the Act, and Complipath certifies nothing.
  • Roles and approvalsWith limitsLegal sees everything in the workspace, and once you name an approver only an approver can confirm a classification. The rule counts the people working in the workspace at that moment: while every named approver has switched to another of their workspaces, anyone who can edit can confirm.
  • Risk registerLiveEach risk your AI systems carry, with the level a person gives it — low, medium or high — the reason in words, an owner, an action and a status; never a score.
  • DPIA and FRIA documentsLiveDrafts the DPIA (GDPR Article 35(7)) and the FRIA (Article 27(1)) from your register by rules, a source on every sentence, the FRIA built on the DPIA (Article 27(4)); a named person confirms it with a date, as PDF and Word, and it becomes a source in the audit room.

Is Complipath an EU AI Act compliance platform or an AI governance platform?

An EU AI Act compliance platform. Complipath is not an AI governance platform. It is EU AI Act compliance, and nothing else. If you searched for an AI governance platform or an AI compliance operating system, the boundary is in the table above: no mapping of ISO/IEC 42001 controls to the Act, no Article 9 testing or lifecycle cycle beyond the risk register, and no post-market monitoring under Article 72.

Which Complipath this is

Complipath (complipath.io), EU AI Act compliance software from Gothenburg, Sweden. Complipath is the company at complipath.io. It has no connection to complipath.systems or complipath.com, which are other services with a similar name (both read on 8 October 2026).

AI literacy

For the people who work with your AI systems, Complipath keeps a record of who has read what, and when.

  • Add the people who work with AI, whether staff, contractors or agency people, with their role and the systems they use, and you get one list of who should read what.
  • Paste a list of names or upload a CSV file, up to 500 at a time, and they are added in one step.
  • Send everyone “AI Act basics (everyone)”, built from the law, and send each system’s own briefing, built from your register, your documentation, your company’s notes and your plan, to the people who work with that system; every version is kept.
  • Write three fields for each system in your own words, and the briefing shows them as written by your company.
  • Press “Send to everyone who hasn’t read it”, or choose people one by one, and the briefing goes to them.
  • Each person gets an email link that works for 30 days and that you can revoke, and you get a link to copy for anyone without an email address.
  • The person reads it and presses “I have read this”, without an account, and the reading is recorded with its date.
  • Record a reading yourself or add training done elsewhere, and it goes into the same record.
  • See each person’s status for each briefing: “Read”, “Earlier version”, “Sent, not read yet”, “Link expired” or “Not sent”.
  • Download the record as a PDF or a CSV file, and you have something to show a customer.

AI literacy is part of Starter and the 30-day trial. It is not part of Free.

Article 4 of the AI Act: providers and deployers “shall take measures to support the development of AI literacy of their staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of AI systems on their behalf”. It has applied since 2 February 2025 (Article 113, third paragraph, point (a)); this wording is from Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (the Digital Omnibus on AI). The same paragraph adds that the obligation “does not require providers or deployers to guarantee any specific level of AI literacy of any individual”. What the duty asks, and of whom: who the AI literacy duty applies to.

The 72-second tour

See how it works in 72 seconds.

The app, shown with an example company. Turn the sound on, or read the captions.

Read the transcript
The tour, paused on the risk class and the article it rests on 1:12 · sound on · captions
Transcript

The EU AI Act is here. Your AI systems now have rules, and deadlines.

Many teams answer with spreadsheets and consultants. One company we spoke with pays about twenty-five thousand kronor a month for outside help.

Complipath starts with your company name. It reads your website and suggests the AI systems it shows. No account needed.

Each system gets its risk class from a rule engine, with the exact article behind it. No guesswork. The source.

You see what each system owes, who owns it and the documentation the law asks for, drafted from your answers.

Ask the assistant anything about the law or your register. Every answer shows its source.

When the law changes, Complipath tells you which of your systems it touches.

Your first system is free, always. Try Starter free for thirty days, no card. Check your AI systems at complipath.io.

What it costs

Starter — €499/month · 20 AI systems · 5 users
Archived systems don’t count toward your limit.
Growth — €1,499/month · 50 AI systems · 25 users
Archived systems don’t count toward your limit.
Scale — €4,999/month · unlimited AI systems
Prices exclude VAT.

Growth and Scale are announced but not yet available. Your first system is free, with no application and nothing asked in exchange. Before you decide anything, the twelve questions an outside reviewer would put to us are answered at what to ask us — four of the answers are no.

How to try it

The classifier is open at complipath.io with no account.

Check your AI systems, free

Book 30 minutes and we set up your first AI systems with you. Book a 30-minute walkthrough

What each plan includes is on the pricing page, plan by plan.

See which of your own AI systems the EU AI Act covers.

Check your AI systems, free

a short set of questions, more if your answers open follow-ups. No account needed. Nothing is saved unless you choose to keep your result.