Compare · Complipath vs ActComply · Last checked 27 October 2026 · ActComply’s pages read 26 October 2026
Each ActComply cell is a sentence from their own site, in their words and not ours, with the page it stood on; each Complipath cell is our own page or our status table. Complipath (complipath.io) is EU AI Act compliance software that classifies each AI system with the article behind the answer.
Price. ActComply's own page, read on 26 October 2026, says "€49/mo"; Complipath Starter at €499 a month or €4,990 a year, with the first system free.
Prices exclude VAT.
ActComply is among the checkers and templates. Its price, in its own words: €49/mo
getactcomply.com. Complipath is €499 a month or €4,990 a year, up to 20 AI systems. Prices exclude VAT.
Complipath costs more than simple AI Act checkers because it also answers your customers' questionnaires with the source of every answer, builds the audit pack and keeps the evidence. Enterprise governance platforms mostly publish no price; the one we could read, Vanta on AWS Marketplace, lists $14,000.00 for 12 months of its Essentials package, against Complipath's €4,990 a year. The three tiers, side by side.
“ActComply assesses your AI systems against the EU AI Act, generates the documentation regulators ask for, and keeps you current as obligations phase in to 2 December 2027.” In their words and not ours.[75]
Prices exclude VAT. Our price is the one on the pricing page.
Counts = requirements met in full. Partly counts as half. “Not stated” counts as zero and is never guessed. ActComply: 24 of 50 stated on the 7 pages we read. Complipath: 47 of 50 answered by our own pages.
Live. Every AI system you build or use, with its owner and risk class. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Tell us what your AI does, who it affects, and what sector it operates in. Takes under 5 minutes per system.”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Step 01 'Describe your AI systems'; plans count 'AI systems assessed'. A register as such (list, owners, status) is not described.
Live. Every AI system you build or use, with its owner and risk class. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. A person behind every system and every duty. The status table: what Complipath is.
Partly. A read-only GitHub or GitLab connection finds AI libraries, calls to AI services and AI key names in the repositories you choose and suggests them for the register, where a person adds them; the free readiness review suggests systems from your public web pages. Source.
With limits. Groups your systems by vendor and shows which papers you hold from each, which are missing and which have expired; for the AI vendors it knows it links the public terms and, where known, the data processing agreement; it quotes a sentence on personal data or training where one was found, with its link and the day read; each quoted page is read again once a month, and a sentence no longer on its page stops showing. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Answers go through rules in code, never a language model, so the same answers always give the same result. Rules decide. AI only drafts. A person confirms. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Our engine classifies each system under the EU AI Act (Prohibited, High-Risk, Limited Risk, or Minimal Risk) with exact article references.”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Step 02 'Get instant risk classification'; how the engine decides is not said here (see f05: the terms call the assessments AI-generated).
Partly. Article 5(1), points (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) are decided. Points (a), (b) and (c) turn on judgement and are flagged for legal review instead of being decided. Source.
“Our engine classifies each system under the EU AI Act (Prohibited, High-Risk, Limited Risk, or Minimal Risk) with exact article references.”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Prohibited is one of the four outcomes; a screening against each Article 5 practice is not described.
Yes. A use case that appears in Annex III is high-risk under Article 6(2) unless the Article 6(3) exemption applies. Source.
Yes. If the use case appears in Annex III, Article 6(2) classifies it high-risk unless the Article 6(3) exemption applies, and profiling of natural persons blocks the exemption entirely. Source.
Partly. Which obligations follow from the role you stated is decided. Whether you are the provider or the deployer is asked, never inferred. Source.
“Article 11 technical documentation, an Article 9 risk management plan, Article 50 transparency measures, and a clear provider versus deployer mapping.”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Part of the 'Compliance Build' service, work done by a person ('I build'); a provider/deployer feature in the self-serve platform is not stated.
With limits. Confirming a classification creates the requirements that follow from it, each with a status, a place for evidence and an owner you fill in: for high risk, the set for the system's role (provider, deployer or both, from its recorded type or confirmed role), and a row for each Article 50 transparency duty. The rows are made at a system's first confirmation; when a later high-risk classification, a role change or a newer catalogue leaves high-risk rows missing, Review proposes them and a person adds them. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Compliance requirement checklist”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Listed under the Starter plan.
Live. Each reason behind a verdict names the provision it rests on, so a reader can check it herself. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Our engine classifies each system under the EU AI Act (Prohibited, High-Risk, Limited Risk, or Minimal Risk) with exact article references.”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Article references are stated for the classification; that each checklist item names its article is not stated.
Live. Each obligation carries the date it applies from, derived from where the provision sits rather than written onto the row. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Records the measures you take to support AI literacy under Article 4 as amended: who was briefed on what, and when. It applies whatever your risk level. The status table: what Complipath is.
Yes. Article 50 makes some systems tell people they are dealing with AI, and a system can carry that duty and be high-risk at the same time. Source.
Live. Checks the provisions your confirmed records cite against amending acts, and emails everyone in the workspace once per act, naming each system it touches. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Monthly regulatory update alerts”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Starter; Growth has 'Weekly regulatory update alerts'.
Growth, opens at launch. Growth, opens at launch: For a provider of a high-risk system: drafts of the EU declaration of conformity (Article 47, Annex V), the EU database registration (Article 49, Annex VIII), the post-market monitoring plan (Article 72), risk management (Article 9) from the risk register and the quality management system (Article 17), each point quoted from the law; a person completes and signs them The status table: what Complipath is.
“I keep your classifications current as systems change, run model-change re-assessments, maintain incident logging and post-market monitoring, and review everything each quarter.”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. A retainer service, done by a person; a post-market monitoring feature in the platform is not stated.
With limits. Logs what went wrong with an AI system and shows the date a serious incident must be reported by, from Article 73 (the shortest date that could apply while answers are Not sure), who is told under Article 73(1), Article 75(1a) and Article 26(5), and a GDPR 72-hour line where personal data is involved; a person decides whether it is serious, the owner is reminded; each incident also shows an internal first report within 24 hours and a cause report within two weeks, which are not dates from the Regulation. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Incident log with Article 73 reporting deadlines”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Listed under the Growth plan; a log with deadlines is stated, drafting or submitting the report is not.
Partly. Complipath does not test models or watch their outputs; a connected Datadog account shows, from your logs, how often each AI service was called and its error rate. Source.
Partly. Each obligation has an owner, a status and a date it applies from. When an amending act touches a provision your records cite, you get an email per affected system. Source.
Live. A workspace for the technical documentation, section by section, saying which Annex IV points each one answers. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Annex IV technical documentation”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Listed under the Starter plan; whether it is produced part by part is not stated.
Live. Drafts a documentation section from the facts in your register, and says which limbs it could not answer. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Get a prioritised action plan, auto-generated documentation templates, and ongoing alerts when regulations change.”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Step 03; the terms (05) call the platform 'AI-powered'.
Live. Two features. 'DPIA and FRIA: whether they apply' says for each confirmed system whether a fundamental rights impact assessment is required, likely or not, quoting Article 27(1). 'DPIA and FRIA documents', in the app's words, drafts the FRIA (Article 27(1)) from your register by rules, built on the DPIA, a source on every sentence, for a named person to confirm with a date: a Growth feature, included in Starter until Growth launches, live since 9 October 2026. The status table: what Complipath is.
“GDPR DPIA and FRIA drafts”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Listed under the Starter plan.
Growth, opens at launch. Growth, opens at launch: For a provider of a high-risk system: drafts of the EU declaration of conformity (Article 47, Annex V), the EU database registration (Article 49, Annex VIII), the post-market monitoring plan (Article 72), risk management (Article 9) from the risk register and the quality management system (Article 17), each point quoted from the law; a person completes and signs them The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. The whole register as a spreadsheet, as JSON or as a PDF, with the exact law texts it was assessed against. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Upload a file once. We read it and use it everywhere it helps: proof for requirements, text for the documentation, and a flag when it disagrees with an earlier answer. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Shows who did what in the workspace, and when, as a list you can read and export. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Audit trail for regulators”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Listed under the Starter plan.
Yes. Confirming a classification stamps it with the person who confirmed it and when; a documentation section is marked reviewed by a named person on a date. Source.
Yes. Each assessment records which version of the legal text it was made against, and which provisions have been amended since. Source.
Live. One file with every classification, citation and confirmation — the one you hand to someone outside your company. The status table: what Complipath is.
“White-label compliance reports”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Listed under the Scale plan.
Partly. A read-only connector (MCP) lets Claude, ChatGPT or another assistant that speaks MCP read the register, once an admin signs in to allow it or with a token your workspace creates; either can be revoked. There is no API for writing to it. Source.
“API access to the assessment engine”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Listed under the Scale plan.
Partly. Read-only connections to GitHub, GitLab, Azure and Datadog find AI in your code and read AI use from your logs, on Starter and up; there is no connection to ML platforms. Source.
No. Complipath does not connect to work tools.
“Webhooks”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Listed under the Scale plan; no named work tool is listed.
Not stated publicly.
Yes. Upload the AI inventory template or your own sheet as an Excel (.xlsx) or CSV file of up to 200 rows, check every row in a preview and send what you import to Review. Risk levels in the file are not imported: the rules classify each system.
Yes. Your workspace is stored in Frankfurt: the database in Supabase's eu-central-1 region and the app's functions in Vercel's fra1 region, read on 8 October 2026. Source.
“Supabase: database and authentication (EU data residency available)”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Privacy policy section 5; EU residency is 'available', not stated as used; the same section lists Vercel for hosting and Anthropic for AI processing, and section 9 says 'Some of our processors operate outside the EEA.'.
Not stated publicly.
No. Complipath is not SOC 2 certified and not ISO 27001 certified. Source.
Live. A code from your phone after the email link. The owner can require it for everyone. The status table: what Complipath is.
No. Complipath runs only as the hosted service.
Starter is €499 a month or €4,990 a year. Prices exclude VAT. Pricing.
“€49/mo”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Starter price on the home page pricing section.
Yes. Your first system is free with no end date. The check needs no account. Source.
“No credit card required for free assessment”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Under the hero buttons; a free assessment (one system, form on 02), not a free plan.
No card. Full access for 30 days, then it drops to the free plan — nothing is deleted and your export keeps working. Pricing.
Starter includes 20 AI systems. Archived systems don’t count toward your limit. Pricing.
“Up to 3 AI systems assessed”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Starter; Growth 'Up to 15 AI systems', Scale 'Unlimited AI systems'.
Yes. Your first system is free with no end date. You pay for your AI portfolio, not your number of employees. Source.
Yes. The check needs no account, and the trial needs no card. Source.
“Prefer to do it yourself? The platform handles classification and documentation on its own.”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. End of the services page, linking to self-serve pricing.
Not stated publicly.
“Classify your AI system in 5 minutes”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Call to action on the risk-classification guide; the home page says 'Takes under 5 minutes per system'.
Not required. The check needs no account, and a walkthrough can be booked if you want one. Source.
“Book a scoping call”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. For the paid services, not for the platform.
Book 30 minutes and we set up your first AI systems with you. Pricing.
“ActComply gives you the platform. When you would rather have the work handled, these are the ways we can do it together.”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 26 October 2026 from getactcomply.com. Paid services, not onboarding included in a plan.
Growth, opens at launch. Growth, opens at launch: Under Frameworks, beside the EU AI Act: the GDPR duties each AI system brings, quoted from the regulation, with what Complipath prepares and what stays yours, and how far your AI management is from ISO/IEC 42001, with a draft statement of applicability; readiness only, never a certificate The status table: what Complipath is.
“ActComply assesses your AI systems against the EU AI Act, generates the documentation regulators ask for, and keeps you current as obligations phase in to 2 December 2027.”ActComply, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from getactcomply.com.
The 7 pages of ActComply's site we read, on 26 October 2026:
It is written by Complipath, so read it as ours. What keeps it checkable is the rule on both sides: each ActComply cell is their own sentence with the page it stood on, and each Complipath cell is what our own pages say. Where a side's pages say nothing, the cell says so.
That none of the 7 pages of ActComply's site we read on 26 October 2026 said it. It is a statement about those pages, listed below, not about the product: ask ActComply before you rule anything out.
Start from the rows you need. Where ActComply's own site states a requirement our pages mark as not supported, they are the closer fit on that row by what each side says publicly. For a European company that wants each classification with its article and the version of the law it used, at a public price, start with Complipath's free check.