Compare · Complipath vs Trustible · Last checked 9 October 2026
Each Trustible cell is a sentence from their own site, in their words and not ours, with the page it stood on; each Complipath cell is our own page or our status table. Complipath (complipath.io) is EU AI Act compliance software that classifies each AI system with the article behind the answer.
“Trustible is the AI governance platform that gives enterprises the clarity, velocity, and confidence to govern AI across its entire lifecycle.” In their words and not ours.[76]
Prices exclude VAT. Our price is the one on the pricing page.
Counts = requirements met in full. Partly counts as half. “Not stated” counts as zero and is never guessed. Trustible: 25 of 50 stated on the 20 pages we read. Complipath: 46 of 50 answered by our own pages.
Live. Every AI system you build or use, with its owner and risk class. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Inventory, assess risk, comply with emerging framework, and agentic governance activity together in a single, real-time view.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Live. Every AI system you build or use, with its owner and risk class. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Trustible's Automated Workflows capture use case context during intake, including whether your organization built the system or is using a third party's, so the right set of obligations gets applied from the start.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Live. A person behind every system and every duty. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Assign owners and governance roles”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Partly. The free readiness review suggests AI systems from your public web pages; a system your website does not describe is in it only if you name it. Source.
Live. Groups your systems by vendor and shows which papers you hold from each, which are missing and which have expired. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Model and Vendor Evaluations apply structured governance to third-party AI.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Live. Answers go through rules in code, never a language model, so the same answers always give the same result. Rules decide. AI only drafts. A person confirms. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Risk-based routing automatically assigns review depth by risk tier”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Partly. Article 5(1), points (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) are decided. Points (a), (b) and (c) turn on judgement and are flagged for legal review instead of being decided. Source.
Yes. A use case that appears in Annex III is high-risk under Article 6(2) unless the Article 6(3) exemption applies. Source.
“You own 3 use cases currently classified as High or Very High risk that qualify as High-Risk AI Systems under the EU AI Act.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Yes. If the use case appears in Annex III, Article 6(2) classifies it high-risk unless the Article 6(3) exemption applies, and profiling of natural persons blocks the exemption entirely. Source.
Partly. Which obligations follow from the role you stated is decided. Whether you are the provider or the deployer is asked, never inferred. Source.
“Trustible's Automated Workflows capture use case context during intake, including whether your organization built the system or is using a third party's, so the right set of obligations gets applied from the start.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Live. Confirming a classification creates the obligations that follow from it, each with an owner, a status and a place for evidence. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Trustible's Automated Workflows capture use case context during intake, including whether your organization built the system or is using a third party's, so the right set of obligations gets applied from the start.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Live. Each reason behind a verdict names the provision it rests on, so a reader can check it herself. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Each obligation carries the date it applies from, derived from where the provision sits rather than written onto the row. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Records who was trained on what and when, against the Article 4 duty to support AI literacy, which applies whatever your risk level. The status table: what Complipath is.
Yes. Article 50 makes some systems tell people they are dealing with AI, and a system can carry that duty and be high-risk at the same time. Source.
Live. Checks the provisions your confirmed records cite against amending acts, and emails you per affected system. The status table: what Complipath is.
“External risk signal monitoring — regulatory updates, incidents”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Not supported. We found no support for this in what we have built. MVP searched 245 shipped source files, 44 migrations, 14 obligation templates, 15 export columns and 12 Annex IV limbs, on the article number and on the provision's own words: nothing on any of the five. The status table: what Complipath is.
“A dedicated set of controls for obligations unique to the EU AI Act: CE marking, Annex IV technical documentation formats, GPAI transparency requirements, and post-market monitoring.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Not supported. We found no support for this in what we have built. Same search, same five places: nothing. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Mitigation and incident tracking”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
No. Complipath does not monitor AI models while they run.
“Continuous oversight of live AI systems, with key metrics and incidents tracked against every use case.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Partly. Each obligation has an owner, a status and a date it applies from. When an amending act touches a provision your records cite, you get an email per affected system. Source.
“Capture every AI use case, model, agent, and vendor. Structured workflows route each by risk automatically.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Live. A workspace for the technical documentation, section by section, saying which Annex IV points each one answers. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Trustible generates and maintains this through intake workflows, risk assessments, and AI Inventory records.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Live. Drafts a documentation section from the facts in your register, and says which limbs it could not answer. The status table: what Complipath is.
Not supported. The step-by-step plan lists Article 27 as a step only for systems classified under points 5(b) and 5(c) of Annex III. Article 27(1) also binds deployers that are bodies governed by public law or private entities providing public services, and the product does not ask whether you are one. Nothing carries the assessment itself. The status table: what Complipath is.
Not supported. The Annex IV documentation asks for a copy of the declaration and you upload it; the plan says to issue it when the system is ready. The declaration itself is not drafted. The status table: what Complipath is.
“A dedicated set of controls for obligations unique to the EU AI Act: CE marking, Annex IV technical documentation formats, GPAI transparency requirements, and post-market monitoring.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Live. The whole register as a spreadsheet, as JSON or as a PDF, with the exact law texts it was assessed against. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Packages export for a specific framework and use case.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Live. Upload a file once. We read it and use it everywhere it helps: proof for requirements, text for the documentation, and a flag when it disagrees with an earlier answer. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Map controls once and satisfy every framework, with audit-ready evidence at every step, automatically.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Live. Shows who did what in the workspace, and when, as a list you can read and export. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Full audit trail generated as work happens”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Yes. Confirming a classification stamps it with the person who confirmed it and when; a documentation section is marked reviewed by a named person on a date. Source.
“Evidence packages bundle the records auditors ask for: intake decisions, risk and impact assessments, approval history, periodic reviews, and policy sign-offs, each timestamped to the use case record.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Yes. Each assessment records which version of the legal text it was made against, and which provisions have been amended since. Source.
Live. One file with every classification, citation and confirmation — the one you hand to someone outside your company. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Evidence packages bundle the records auditors ask for: intake decisions, risk and impact assessments, approval history, periodic reviews, and policy sign-offs, each timestamped to the use case record.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
No. Complipath has no API for customers.
No. Complipath does not connect to ML or engineering tools.
No. Complipath does not connect to work tools.
Not stated publicly.
Not stated publicly.
Yes. Your workspace is stored in Frankfurt: the database in Supabase's eu-central-1 region and the app's functions in Vercel's fra1 region, read on 8 October 2026. Source.
Not stated publicly.
No. Complipath is not SOC 2 certified and not ISO 27001 certified. Source.
“SOC 2 certified”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Live. A code from your phone after the email link. The owner can require it for everyone. The status table: what Complipath is.
No. Complipath runs only as the hosted service.
Starter is €499 a month. Prices exclude VAT. Pricing.
Yes. Your first system is free with no end date. The check needs no account. Source.
No card. Full access for 30 days, then it drops to the free plan — nothing is deleted and your export keeps working. Pricing.
Starter includes 20 AI systems. Archived systems don’t count toward your limit. Pricing.
Yes. Your first system is free with no end date. You pay for your AI portfolio, not your number of employees. Source.
Yes. The check needs no account, and the trial needs no card. Source.
Not stated publicly.
“Most organizations establish a working AI inventory and intake process within 30 days, operationalize risk-based workflows by day 60, and scale governance with full executive reporting by day 90.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Not required. The check needs no account, and a walkthrough can be booked if you want one. Source.
“Request a demo”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Book 30 minutes and we set up your first AI systems with you. Pricing.
“We onboard your team, connect your systems, and build a single source of truth for every AI use case, model, and vendor.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
Not supported. The assistant answers questions about ISO/IEC 42001 next to the AI Act. There is no mapping of its controls to the Act, and Complipath certifies nothing. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Map controls to EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001, & industry leading frameworks”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
“Trustible is the AI governance platform that gives enterprises the clarity, velocity, and confidence to govern AI across its entire lifecycle.”Trustible, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from trustible.ai.
The 20 pages of Trustible's site we read, on 9 October 2026:
It is written by Complipath, so read it as ours. What keeps it checkable is the rule on both sides: each Trustible cell is their own sentence with the page it stood on, and each Complipath cell is what our own pages say. Where a side's pages say nothing, the cell says so.
That none of the 20 pages of Trustible's site we read on 9 October 2026 said it. It is a statement about those pages, listed below, not about the product: ask Trustible before you rule anything out.
Start from the rows you need. Where Trustible's own site states a requirement our pages mark as not supported, they are the closer fit on that row by what each side says publicly. For a European company that wants each classification with its article and the version of the law it used, at a public price, start with Complipath's free check.