Compare · Complipath vs Euridium · Last checked 9 October 2026
Each Euridium cell is a sentence from their own site, in their words and not ours, with the page it stood on; each Complipath cell is our own page or our status table. Complipath (complipath.io) is EU AI Act compliance software that classifies each AI system with the article behind the answer.
“Every action enters a chain of cryptographic hashes that anyone can verify.” In their words and not ours.[79]
“Why it exists, when it is met, the action, the evidence expected, the ISO 42001 / 27001 mapping.” In their words and not ours.[80]
“The AI features can be switched off for a customer that wants it.” In their words and not ours.[81]
Prices exclude VAT. Our price is the one on the pricing page.
Counts = requirements met in full. Partly counts as half. “Not stated” counts as zero and is never guessed. Euridium: 28 of 50 stated on the 8 pages we read. Complipath: 46 of 50 answered by our own pages.
Live. Every AI system you build or use, with its owner and risk class The status table: what Complipath is.
“Euridium registers each AI system, classifies it under the EU AI Act, lists the obligations for your role, and keeps the evidence, the sign-offs and the audit trail together.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Live. Every AI system you build or use, with its owner and risk class The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. A person behind every system and every duty The status table: what Complipath is.
“Name it, answer the classification questions, name an owner.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Partly. The free readiness review suggests AI systems from your public web pages; a system your website does not describe is in it only if you name it. Source.
Live. An AI tool you buy is registered and classified like one you build, with the obligations of a deployer and the AI literacy record. There is no vendor questionnaire and no contract review. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Supplier proof requests and the DORA module are in build.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Live. Answers go through rules in code, never a language model, so the same answers always give the same result. Rules decide. AI only drafts. A person confirms. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Each system gets a risk tier, and the reason is written out.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Partly. Article 5(1), points (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) are decided. Points (a), (b) and (c) turn on judgement and are flagged for legal review instead of being decided. Source.
Yes. A use case that appears in Annex III is high-risk under Article 6(2) unless the Article 6(3) exemption applies. Source.
“Annex I or Annex III, the Article 6(3) filter, Article 25 when a deployer becomes a provider, Article 2 exclusions.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Yes. If the use case appears in Annex III, Article 6(2) classifies it high-risk unless the Article 6(3) exemption applies, and profiling of natural persons blocks the exemption entirely. Source.
“Annex I or Annex III, the Article 6(3) filter, Article 25 when a deployer becomes a provider, Article 2 exclusions.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Partly. Which obligations follow from the role you stated is decided. Whether you are the provider or the deployer is asked, never inferred. Source.
“The engine derives the tier and the obligations for your role.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Live. Confirming a classification creates the obligations that follow from it, each with an owner, a status and a place for evidence The status table: what Complipath is.
“Euridium holds, for each AI system, the obligations that apply, the evidence, the signatures and the audit trail.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Live. Each reason behind a verdict names the provision it rests on, so a reader can check it herself The status table: what Complipath is.
“Article by article, with the proof expected.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Live. Each obligation carries the date it applies from, derived from where the provision sits rather than written onto the row The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Records who was trained on what and when, against the Article 4 duty to support AI literacy, which applies whatever your risk level The status table: what Complipath is.
Yes. Article 50 makes some systems tell people they are dealing with AI, and a system can carry that duty and be high-risk at the same time. Source.
Live. Checks the provisions your confirmed records cite against amending acts, and emails you per affected system The status table: what Complipath is.
“A banner flags regulatory updates that touch its obligations; nothing changes on its own.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Not supported. We found no support for this in what we have built. MVP searched 245 shipped source files, 44 migrations, 14 obligation templates, 15 export columns and 12 Annex IV limbs, on the article number and on the provision's own words: nothing on any of the five. The status table: what Complipath is.
Not supported. We found no support for this in what we have built. Same search, same five places: nothing. The status table: what Complipath is.
No. Complipath does not monitor AI models while they run.
Partly. Each obligation has an owner, a status and a date it applies from. When an amending act touches a provision your records cite, you get an email per affected system. Source.
Live. A workspace for the technical documentation, section by section, saying which Annex IV points each one answers The status table: what Complipath is.
“The Annex IV documentation, ready to hand over.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Live. Drafts a documentation section from the facts in your register, and says which limbs it could not answer The status table: what Complipath is.
“In build: AI drafting of the file, December 2026”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Not supported. The step-by-step plan lists Article 27 as a step only for systems classified under points 5(b) and 5(c) of Annex III. Article 27(1) also binds deployers that are bodies governed by public law or private entities providing public services, and the product does not ask whether you are one. Nothing carries the assessment itself. The status table: what Complipath is.
Not supported. The Annex IV documentation asks for a copy of the declaration and you upload it; the plan says to issue it when the system is ready. The declaration itself is not drafted. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. The whole register as a spreadsheet, as JSON or as a PDF, with the exact law texts it was assessed against The status table: what Complipath is.
“Section by section, tied to the obligations and the evidence behind it, exportable as PDF.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Live. A file linked to the requirements it proves, with the passage and its page The status table: what Complipath is.
“A policy, a supplier contract, a model card, a training-data sheet: each item is dated and attached to every obligation it supports.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Live. Who did what, and when. No one can edit or delete a line, an owner included; only deleting the whole workspace removes it The status table: what Complipath is.
“Every action enters a hash chain an auditor can verify.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Yes. Confirming a classification stamps it with the person who confirmed it and when; a documentation section is marked reviewed by a named person on a date. Source.
““Compliant” is locked behind attached evidence and a signature; a one-person sign-off is marked as such.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Yes. Each assessment records which version of the legal text it was made against, and which provisions have been amended since. Source.
In progress. One file for an auditor: every system, its classification, evidence, the audit log and a fingerprint. Not available yet. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Export the Annex IV documentation and the audit trail.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
No. Complipath has no API for customers.
No. Complipath does not connect to ML or engineering tools.
No. Complipath does not connect to work tools.
Not stated publicly.
Not stated publicly.
Yes. Your workspace is stored in Frankfurt: the database in Supabase's eu-central-1 region and the app's functions in Vercel's fra1 region, read on 8 October 2026. Source.
“Your workspace data is stored on EU-based cloud infrastructure.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Not stated publicly.
“All traffic is served over HTTPS, and data is encrypted at rest by our infrastructure provider.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
No. Complipath is not SOC 2 certified and not ISO 27001 certified. Source.
“We do not currently hold formal third-party certifications such as SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Live. A code from your phone after the email link, which the owner can require for everyone The status table: what Complipath is.
No. Complipath runs only as the hosted service.
Starter is €499 a month. Prices exclude VAT. Pricing.
“Starter €300–800 / month”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu. The same page says "Prices are hypotheses until the first pilots confirm them, and we say so."
Yes. Your first system is free with no end date. The check needs no account. Source.
“Or start with the free check”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
No card. Full access for 30 days, then it drops to the free plan — nothing is deleted and your export keeps working. Pricing.
Starter includes 20 AI systems. Archived systems don’t count toward your limit. Pricing.
“A subscription per regime and per system.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Yes. Your first system is free with no end date. You pay for your AI portfolio, not your number of employees. Source.
“For a company without a legal team.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Yes. The check needs no account, and the trial needs no card. Source.
Not stated publicly.
“Get an instant orientation on whether you are in scope and at what risk level — no account, no data leaves your browser.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu. About the free applicability check.
Not required. The check needs no account, and a walkthrough can be booked if you want one. Source.
“Thirty minutes, screen shared, on the demo workspace or on a system of yours.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Book 30 minutes and we set up your first AI systems with you. Pricing.
“Onboarding and audit support, priced separately and deliberately capped.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
Not supported. The assistant answers questions about ISO/IEC 42001 next to the AI Act. There is no mapping of its controls to the Act, and Complipath certifies nothing. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Why it exists, when it is met, the action, the evidence expected, the ISO 42001 / 27001 mapping.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
“Every action enters a chain of cryptographic hashes that anyone can verify.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
“Why it exists, when it is met, the action, the evidence expected, the ISO 42001 / 27001 mapping.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
“The AI features can be switched off for a customer that wants it.”Euridium, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from euridium.eu.
The 8 pages of Euridium's site we read, on 9 October 2026:
It is written by Complipath, so read it as ours. What keeps it checkable is the rule on both sides: each Euridium cell is their own sentence with the page it stood on, and each Complipath cell is what our own pages say. Where a side's pages say nothing, the cell says so.
That none of the 8 pages of Euridium's site we read on 9 October 2026 said it. It is a statement about those pages, listed below, not about the product: ask Euridium before you rule anything out.
Start from the rows you need. Where Euridium's own site states a requirement our pages mark as not supported, they are the closer fit on that row by what each side says publicly. For a European company that wants each classification with its article and the version of the law it used, at a public price, start with Complipath's free check.