Compare · Complipath vs Monitaur · Last checked 9 October 2026
Each Monitaur cell is a sentence from their own site, in their words and not ours, with the page it stood on; each Complipath cell is our own page or our status table. Complipath (complipath.io) is EU AI Act compliance software that classifies each AI system with the article behind the answer.
“Deliver responsible and compliant AI adoption by continuously monitoring model performance and applying standardized governance across every AI system” In their words and not ours.[68]
Prices exclude VAT. Our price is the one on the pricing page.
Counts = requirements met in full. Partly counts as half. “Not stated” counts as zero and is never guessed. Monitaur: 17 of 50 stated on the 17 pages we read. Complipath: 46 of 50 answered by our own pages.
Live. Every AI system you build or use, with its owner and risk class. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Capture all of your business use cases and related models in a centralized home.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Live. Every AI system you build or use, with its owner and risk class. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Manage internal and third-party AI risks in one system”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Live. A person behind every system and every duty. The status table: what Complipath is.
Partly. The free readiness review suggests AI systems from your public web pages; a system your website does not describe is in it only if you name it. Source.
Live. Groups your systems by vendor and shows which papers you hold from each, which are missing and which have expired. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Simplify management of your third-party AI vendor ecosystem with centralized inventory and pre-mapped controls for GenAI and Agentic AI.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Live. Answers go through rules in code, never a language model, so the same answers always give the same result. Rules decide. AI only drafts. A person confirms. The status table: what Complipath is.
Partly. Article 5(1), points (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) are decided. Points (a), (b) and (c) turn on judgement and are flagged for legal review instead of being decided. Source.
Yes. A use case that appears in Annex III is high-risk under Article 6(2) unless the Article 6(3) exemption applies. Source.
“Launch in days with our fully vetted library of 33 flexible controls for high-risk models.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Yes. If the use case appears in Annex III, Article 6(2) classifies it high-risk unless the Article 6(3) exemption applies, and profiling of natural persons blocks the exemption entirely. Source.
Partly. Which obligations follow from the role you stated is decided. Whether you are the provider or the deployer is asked, never inferred. Source.
Live. Confirming a classification creates the obligations that follow from it, each with an owner, a status and a place for evidence. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Each reason behind a verdict names the provision it rests on, so a reader can check it herself. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Each obligation carries the date it applies from, derived from where the provision sits rather than written onto the row. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Records who was trained on what and when, against the Article 4 duty to support AI literacy, which applies whatever your risk level. The status table: what Complipath is.
Yes. Article 50 makes some systems tell people they are dealing with AI, and a system can carry that duty and be high-risk at the same time. Source.
Live. Checks the provisions your confirmed records cite against amending acts, and emails you per affected system. The status table: what Complipath is.
Not supported. We found no support for this in what we have built. MVP searched 245 shipped source files, 44 migrations, 14 obligation templates, 15 export columns and 12 Annex IV limbs, on the article number and on the provision's own words: nothing on any of the five. The status table: what Complipath is.
Not supported. We found no support for this in what we have built. Same search, same five places: nothing. The status table: what Complipath is.
No. Complipath does not monitor AI models while they run.
“Maintain an objective pulse on AI risk with automated drift and bias validations.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Partly. Each obligation has an owner, a status and a date it applies from. When an amending act touches a provision your records cite, you get an email per affected system. Source.
Live. A workspace for the technical documentation, section by section, saying which Annex IV points each one answers. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Drafts a documentation section from the facts in your register, and says which limbs it could not answer. The status table: what Complipath is.
Not supported. The step-by-step plan lists Article 27 as a step only for systems classified under points 5(b) and 5(c) of Annex III. Article 27(1) also binds deployers that are bodies governed by public law or private entities providing public services, and the product does not ask whether you are one. Nothing carries the assessment itself. The status table: what Complipath is.
Not supported. The Annex IV documentation asks for a copy of the declaration and you upload it; the plan says to issue it when the system is ready. The declaration itself is not drafted. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. The whole register as a spreadsheet, as JSON or as a PDF, with the exact law texts it was assessed against. The status table: what Complipath is.
Live. Upload a file once. We read it and use it everywhere it helps: proof for requirements, text for the documentation, and a flag when it disagrees with an earlier answer. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Take advantage of your existing investments and centralize evidence of end-to-end governance.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Live. Shows who did what in the workspace, and when, as a list you can read and export. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Automate Record creates a transparent record of every AI decision , capturing behavior against safe ranges to turn noisy alerts into risk-aligned events.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Yes. Confirming a classification stamps it with the person who confirmed it and when; a documentation section is marked reviewed by a named person on a date. Source.
“Clear standards for model approval”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Yes. Each assessment records which version of the legal text it was made against, and which provisions have been amended since. Source.
Live. One file with every classification, citation and confirmation — the one you hand to someone outside your company. The status table: what Complipath is.
“Validate AI models at scale with consistent protocols and transparent reporting.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
No. Complipath has no API for customers.
“Rich client libraries and comprehensive API access easily connects to your existing modeling and MLOps tools.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
No. Complipath does not connect to ML or engineering tools.
“Rich client libraries and comprehensive API access easily connects to your existing modeling and MLOps tools.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
No. Complipath does not connect to work tools.
Not stated publicly.
Not stated publicly.
Yes. Your workspace is stored in Frankfurt: the database in Supabase's eu-central-1 region and the app's functions in Vercel's fra1 region, read on 8 October 2026. Source.
Not stated publicly.
“Monitaur encrypts data, whether at rest or in transit, for all of our customers.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
No. Complipath is not SOC 2 certified and not ISO 27001 certified. Source.
“Monitaur has maintained SOC2 Type 2 compliance since October 2021.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Live. A code from your phone after the email link. The owner can require it for everyone. The status table: what Complipath is.
No. Complipath runs only as the hosted service.
Starter is €499 a month. Prices exclude VAT. Pricing.
Yes. Your first system is free with no end date. The check needs no account. Source.
No card. Full access for 30 days, then it drops to the free plan — nothing is deleted and your export keeps working. Pricing.
Starter includes 20 AI systems. Archived systems don’t count toward your limit. Pricing.
Yes. Your first system is free with no end date. You pay for your AI portfolio, not your number of employees. Source.
Yes. The check needs no account, and the trial needs no card. Source.
Not stated publicly.
“AI trust and transparency in less than 90 days”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Not required. The check needs no account, and a walkthrough can be booked if you want one. Source.
“Demo: Platform”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Book 30 minutes and we set up your first AI systems with you. Pricing.
“Whether you’re struggling to get started or get aligned, our modular enterprise AI policy templates and hands-on workshops will help your team agree and commit..”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
Not supported. The assistant answers questions about ISO/IEC 42001 next to the AI Act. There is no mapping of its controls to the Act, and Complipath certifies nothing. The status table: what Complipath is.
“This decision logging provides evidence automatically mapped to our Common Controls, satisfying requirements for frameworks like NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act.”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
“Deliver responsible and compliant AI adoption by continuously monitoring model performance and applying standardized governance across every AI system”Monitaur, in their words and not ours. It was read on 9 October 2026 from monitaur.ai.
The 17 pages of Monitaur's site we read, on 9 October 2026:
It is written by Complipath, so read it as ours. What keeps it checkable is the rule on both sides: each Monitaur cell is their own sentence with the page it stood on, and each Complipath cell is what our own pages say. Where a side's pages say nothing, the cell says so.
That none of the 17 pages of Monitaur's site we read on 9 October 2026 said it. It is a statement about those pages, listed below, not about the product: ask Monitaur before you rule anything out.
Start from the rows you need. Where Monitaur's own site states a requirement our pages mark as not supported, they are the closer fit on that row by what each side says publicly. For a European company that wants each classification with its article and the version of the law it used, at a public price, start with Complipath's free check.